Skip to Content
 

Colossians 1:16

Listen to this page
Open the MP3 directly

The context

Colossians addresses a congregation Paul had not founded, and much of the letter answers a teaching the author calls a "philosophy" (2:8), marked by ascetic rules, visions, and attention to principalities. The answer is not a rebuttal in kind but a claim about who Christ is.

Verses 1:15-20 read as a hymn or a hymn-like composition, . Verse 15 calls him the image of the invisible God and the firstborn of all creation; verse 16 grounds that with "for."

The words

Verse 16 uses a triad of prepositions: en autō, "in him"; di' autou, "through him"; and eis auton, "for him." The same triad appears in Romans 11:36: source, agency, and goal all located in the Son.

Ektisthē is an aorist passive of ktizō, "to create," and ta panta, "all things," is repeated for emphasis, then specified as things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible. The list that follows names thronoi, kyriotētes, archai, exousiai — thrones, dominions, rulers, authorities — the cosmic powers the letter later says were disarmed (2:15).

Prōtotokos in verse 15, "firstborn," is the contested word. In the Greek Old Testament and in Psalm 89:27 it denotes rank and inheritance — "I will make him the firstborn, the highest of the kings of the earth" — rather than mere temporal priority. That usage is about status and heirship, though the word alone does not settle the question.

What this passage establishes

All things, including the invisible powers, came to be through the Son and exist for him. Creation is not initiated by God and then left to itself; its origin, continuance, and purpose are all located in Christ.

What it does not establish

It does not by itself settle what "firstborn" means. Arius read it as evidence that the Son is a creature, the first one made. The orthodox reply rests on the word's usage for rank and on verses 16-17, but a reader who isolates verse 15 can go the other way.

It does not explain how creation was mediated. The prepositions assert agency and goal; they supply no mechanism and no metaphysics of intermediate causes. Later theology built systems here; the verse is spare.

It does not identify the powers or settle their fate. The terms are general, and whether 1:20 teaches reconciliation of all such beings is disputed. The verse says they were created through him; it does not describe their end.

How the church has read it

This was a principal text in the Arian controversy, and Athanasius argued from 1:16-17 that the Son cannot be among the things made, since all things were made through him. The hymn entered the liturgy early, and its language shaped the creeds' account of creation through the Son. Modern exegetes argue over whether the hymn is pre-Pauline and whether its cosmic Christology is deployed or corrected by the letter's author — a question about composition rather than about the claim.

First pass, written October 2026. Corrections welcome.

Cited in these answers

Part of Scripture, Opened — the exegetical layer behind every citation on this site. Scripture quotations are from the ESV.