John 1:1-3
Listen to this page
Open the MP3 directly
The context
John's Gospel opens with a prologue before the narrative proper begins with John the Baptist. The prologue moves from the Word before creation, through creation and life and light, to the witness of John and the statement of verse 14 that the Word became flesh.
Verses 1 to 3 are the foundation of that movement, and many read the prologue as an early hymn with additions. The first verse has three clauses, the third of which the church's later argument rests on. Verse 3 then turns from who the Word is to what the Word did.
The words
En archē, "in the beginning," reproduces the opening words of the Greek Old Testament's first verse.
Logos is "word, account, reason." John uses it without definition, and its background is disputed among the Hebrew notion of God's creative word and Greek philosophical usage. The Gospel does not resolve the question.
The verb tenses carry weight. Verses 1 and 2 use ēn, the imperfect of eimi: the Word was. Verse 3 uses egeneto, the aorist of ginomai: all things came to be. The contrast returns at verse 14, where the Word became flesh. What is created comes into being; the Word does not.
Pros ton theon is pros with the accusative, "toward, with" God — a preposition of orientation implying relation and distinction. Then theos ēn ho logos: theos stands first without the article, marking it as the predicate. The clause says the Word is God; it does not say the Word is the Father.
What this passage establishes
The passage establishes that the Word existed before creation, was with God, was God, and was the agent through whom everything came to be. That is the prologue's claim, and it is the raw material for the later doctrine of the Trinity.
What it does not establish
It does not state the Nicene doctrine. Homoousios, eternal generation, and the distinction between person and nature are fourth-century formulations answering questions this verse does not pose. They may be the right answers; they are not the words of the text.
It does not settle the meaning of logos. The Gospel's silence about the term's background is a fact to be respected rather than filled in.
It does not describe how creation happened. "Through him" asserts agency, not mechanism. The verse is not a cosmology, and no single sentence carries the whole case.
How the church has read it
John 1:1 was the central text of the Arian controversy. Arius read the imperfect and the anarthrous predicate as evidence of a subordinate Word; Athanasius answered from the whole prologue. Nicaea in 325 and Constantinople in 381 settled the question with a word not in the text. Luther and Calvin both treat the verse as the clearest statement of Christ's deity in the New Testament.
First pass, written October 2026. Corrections welcome.
Cited in these answers
Part of Scripture, Opened — the exegetical layer behind every citation on this site. Scripture quotations are from the ESV.