Judges 21:25

The context

Judges ends with two appendix stories of social collapse, including a civil war against Benjamin and the abduction of women at Shiloh. The closing sentence repeats a refrain heard earlier in the book: there was no king, and each person did what seemed right to himself.

What it establishes

It establishes the narrator's diagnosis of the period: the absence of a central authority coincided with moral chaos, and the book's final image is of a society that cannot govern itself.

What it does not establish

It does not argue that monarchy was the answer. The narrator states a fact about the period and leaves it there; the books that follow show kings failing badly, and Samuel warns against the request. Nor does the verse describe a golden age of conscience.

Short note, first pass, October 2026. Corrections welcome.

Cited in these answers

• So you believe in a book full of contradictions, one that endorses slavery, incest, murder, drowning babies, genocide and stoning homosexuals?

Part of Scripture, Opened — the exegetical layer behind every citation on this site. Scripture quotations are from the ESV.