Skip to Content
 

Luke 1:1-4

Listen to this page
Open the MP3 directly

The context

These four verses open Luke's Gospel and are the only passage of their kind in the four Gospels: a formal preface, in the manner of Greek historical prose, explaining the author's method before he tells his story. Everything after it — the annunciation, the birth narratives, the journey to Jerusalem — sits under the claim made here.

The book is addressed to Theophilus, otherwise unknown. "Most excellent" (kratistos) is the form used elsewhere in the New Testament for a Roman official, which may indicate a patron of standing, though the name could also mean "lover of God."

The words

Diēgēsis, "account," is a telling rather than a theological essay. Luke says many had already "undertaken to draw up" (anataxasthai) such an account, a verb carrying the sense of arranging material in order. He places his work in a crowded field.

The sources are "eyewitnesses and ministers of the word." Autoptai, "eyewitnesses," is built from autos and a root for seeing: those who saw for themselves. The participle parēkolouthēkoti, "having followed closely," is perfect tense — a settled course of investigation, not casual acquaintance.

The stated purpose turns on asphaleia, "certainty": the quality of what is secure, what will not give way under you. Luke does not promise that Theophilus will find the account satisfying; he claims it is reliable in what it asserts.

What this passage establishes

The text presents itself as historiography — an ordered account drawn from named categories of sources, written so a specific reader may know the reliability of instruction he has already received. Luke does not present his Gospel as an unselfconscious folk tale; the claim is about method and intention, in the text's own voice.

What it does not establish

It does not make Luke an eyewitness. The eyewitnesses are others, "those who from the beginning" saw. Luke's position is that of the careful later investigator, and the preface is honest about the distance.

It does not prove the Gospel's accuracy. A claim to careful research is a claim about procedure — evidence of intent, not a guarantee of result, and it settles no particular historical question in the chapters that follow.

It does not identify Theophilus or fix a date. Whether the name belongs to a patron, a catechumen, or a literary device is not settled here, and the preface supplies no chronological anchor.

How the church has read it

Patristic writers took the preface as evidence that Luke wrote as a careful compiler, and the attribution to Luke is early and widely attested. Modern study reads the paragraph alongside Greek scientific prefaces, an approach associated especially with Henry Cadbury, used both to defend Luke's historiographic seriousness and to argue that he writes in a conventional genre making conventional claims.

First pass, written October 2026. Corrections welcome.

Cited in these answers

Part of Scripture, Opened — the exegetical layer behind every citation on this site. Scripture quotations are from the ESV.